Submission Number: MBTL-EIS-0003058
Received: 11/13/2013 2:09:00 PM
Commenter: Mitzi Lannom
Agency: Cowlitz County, the Washington Department of Ecology, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Initiative: Millennium Bulk-Terminals Longview EIS
Attachments: No Attachments
From:email@example.com Sent:Wednesday, November 13, 2013 2:10 PM To:firstname.lastname@example.org Subject:Comments for Env. Impact Statement on coal export
Please include my comments as part of the public response to the proposed coal export terminal at Longview. This project should move forward without delay.
The scoping decision should require that the EIS incorporate existing environmental documents in lieu of necessitating new reports and examination. This should be used to prevent the EIS from accumulating background data where such data already is in existing approved NEPA documents. For example, the BLM's Wright Area EIS analyzes the impact from consumption in coal burning plants of the entire annual output of the PRB--~ 450 mtpy. It concludes the impact is not significant. Surely then 50 mtpy , or even the cumulative impact of 100 mtpy from Millennium, Gateway and Coyote is not significant. Therefor this topic can be addressed briefly and the work of the BLM EIS can be incorporated by reference in support.
So let's get moving as quickly as possible to make this project happen. It's what's best for Washington, and best for our economy and tax base.
Sincerely, Mitzi D Lannom email@example.com