Submission Number: MBTL-EIS-0002322 

Received: 11/18/2013 9:07:17 PM
Commenter: Stephanie Buffum
Organization: Friends of the San Juans
State: Washington

Agency: Cowlitz County, the Washington Department of Ecology, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Initiative: Millennium Bulk-Terminals Longview EIS
Attachments: No Attachments
Submission Text
IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND SEA LEVEL RISE The burning of coal releases carbon dioxide that contributes to global climate change. The adverse effects of climate change are those which result in changes to the physical environment or biota and which have significant deleterious effects on the composition, resilience, or productivity of natural and managed ecosystems or on the operation of socio-economic systems or on human health and welfare. The potential impacts of this change upon island communities such as the San Juan Islands are astronomical. The San Juans are comprised of over 450 islands, rocks, and pinnacles. The islands are inhabited residents, summer recreation areas, research sites, or nesting or breeding haul out sites for marine mammals and seabirds. Washington State is believed to be particularly vulnerable to a warming climate particularly because of its snow-fed water supplies that provide drinking water, irrigation for agriculture and which are also responsible for nearly three-fourths of the state’s electrical power. In addition to the San Juan Islands, nearly 40 other communities, including some of the state’s largest population areas, exist along 2,300 miles of Washington’s shoreline, which is threatened by rising sea levels and ocean acidification. It has been estimated that if no action is taken, potential costs to Washington state from climate change impacts are projected to reach nearly $10 billion per year by 2020 from increased health costs, storm damage, coastal destruction, rising energy costs, increased wildfires, drought, and other impacts. Due to the severity of this threat, Pacific coast leaders in the United States have recognized this threat to their regional environment and economy and on October 28, 2013, leaders of California, Oregon, Washington and British Columbia signed the Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate and Energy. Climate impacts to island communities are well documented. Small islands are at the forefront of the extreme risks posed by climatic change. The threat of, ‘possible adverse effects of sea level rise on islands’ was recognized in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Small islands are among those that contribute least to global climate change and sea level rise, they are among those that would suffer most from the adverse effects of such phenomena and could in some cases become uninhabitable. Based on the tonnage of coal proposed to be exported and subsequently burned, we would request that the MBTL EIS include an analysis on the impacts of climate change on the San Juans. Please address the following: 1. What would be the impacts of the acceleration of climate change to San Juan County’s replacing public infrastructure (roads, water, sewer, and electric utilities)? 2. What would be the costs from associated increased storm winds, ocean surges, and precipitation on the San Juans from climate change? 3. What are the impact of sea level rise on marine mammal haul out sites and nesting and/or foraging sites for seabirds? 4. What would be the costs associated with more intense storms coinciding with the highest tides on our public roads and infrastructure? 5. The burning of coal releases mercury. Based on the tonnage of coal proposed to be exported and subsequently burned? What amount of mercury will be released and what amount of that mercury will increase the mercury content of San Juan County seafood and the people and wildlife that feed upon that seafood? 6. Prevailing winds send mercury that is burned in Asia back towards the U. S. Pacific Northwest. What would be the impacts of the increased mercury pollution? 7. How would the increased mercury pollution impact fish consumption rates? What would be the costs associated with the increased mercury pollution? 8. What would be the impacts on the health and reproduction of the Southern Resident Killer Whale from increased mercury pollution?