Submission Number: MBTL-EIS-0001819 

Received: 11/4/2013 9:57:00 AM
Commenter: Michael Meredith
Organization: 
State: 

Agency: Cowlitz County, the Washington Department of Ecology, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Initiative: Millennium Bulk-Terminals Longview EIS
Attachments: No Attachments
Submission Text
From:Michael.Meredith@roche-engineering.com Sent:Monday, November 04, 2013 9:57 AM To:comments@millenniumbulkeiswa.gov Subject:Scoping comments on Millennium Bulk Terminals
I would like to add my support to the proposed port at Longview and ask that the environmental study proceed rapidly. The lead agencies should conduct a local study on our environment. It's unrealistic and unprecedented to conduct a cradle-to-grave EIS that studies the harvesting, development or manufacturing of a product or commodity to and including the end use of the product or commodity. Using the wheat export terminals as an example, the Department of Ecology did not require the study of nationwide rail impacts, nor the end usage of the wheat at its destination. As you well know, an EIS is supposed to take a "hard look at environmental consequences" and reach a decision based on the facts presented. The scope of this document should be limited to the immediate impacted areas so we can keep moving forward. Hundreds of people with families are not only waiting but depending on having the security of a long-term, good-paying job. Sincerely, Michael Meredith Michael.Meredith@roche-engineering.com